• Not a Member? It's Free to Sign Up
  • Login
  • New Add url
  • Watch Gandhi

    Download with 9042 Kb/s download speeds

    mirrors

    ID Mirror Views Broken Alive Date Category
    85671 Gandhi (1982) CD2 450 0 0 2010-04-01 Movie
    85672 Gandhi (1982) CD1 356 0 0 2010-04-01 Movie
    199782 Gandhi (1982) CD2 332 0 0 2011-04-06 Movie
    199783 Gandhi (1982) CD1 371 0 0 2011-04-06 Movie

    Watch Gandhi movie

    Gandhi
    • IMDB rating: 8.20
    • IMDB votes: 37288
    • Release Date: 1982
    Download with 9042 Kb/s download speeds

    More information :

    !! This video is hosted on Megavideo. You need the latest flash player to watch this video. Download, install and reboot your browser. User: jayson__wang
    Added: 7 October 2005
    Vote: 15

    Long and Boring. Factually and Historically Inaccurate. Really Stinks Bad.

    This movie is very long and very boring making it very hard to stayawake. This movie is historically and factually inaccurate. The Britishfreed the Indians from Moslem rule and brought extensive employment tothe region. This movie contains extensive British bashing and doesn'texplore the suffering the British soldiers had to contend with livingin such a seedy and dirty society. The more the film portrayed theBritish as evil the more the viewer cheered them on. If British 'rule'was so bad then why are Indians flooding all the nations founded onBritish rule (i.e. US, UK, Canada, NZ, and Australia)?
    This movie is a typical Hollywood attempt to make a 'feel good' moviebut only the feebleminded will be fooled Pulling out any history booksor traveling the globe more often and you would know why. This moviereally stinks. I would give it a lower rating but '1' is the lowestallowed. A real stinker.

    User: Togo456
    Added: 14 November 2006
    Vote: 14

    Movie STINKS. Complete FALSEIFICATION of history.

    A complete joke of a film whose producers clearly (and unfortunatelysuccessfully) try to push the "feel good" emotional aspect of Gandhiwithout showing the truth and consequence of his actions. Part of thereason of the film's commercial and critical success despite thecomplete inaccuracy is the basic ignorance of the lay viewer. Viewersjust want to see a happy ending regardless of truth and if this happyending is achieved the expense of the "evil White man" then modernHollywood feels good about itself.
    India had been a "country" of numerous racial, religious and ethnicgroups clash very violently with one another. The introduction ofBritish trade brought a sense of stability that the region had neverseen in its entire history. India is in more of a mess today than everbefore. So much of the country has gone downhill that there has been amass exodus of millions to flood all first world countries as well asmany other 3rd world countries. This is even with the flooding ofoutsourced jobs in the fields of telecom and computers into the regionby first world countries! I wouldn't be surprised if India has thehighest absolute number of people emigrating.
    In short this movie stinks. It is completely and entirely inaccurate.Take everything with a grain a salt or even better do not watch italtogether.

    User: voyages-1
    Added: 30 May 2007
    Vote: 13

    Far away from reality....

    I like historical movies very much but this is a complete manipulationof the truth. 1. Gandhi in real life was a totally arrogant man. 2. Infirst place Gandhi was a nationalist and not an humanist. 3. AfterIndia was independent it was chaos and anarchy, Gandhi was killed andIndia fell apart in 3 countries (India, Pakistan & Bangladesh), yearsof war in the 70's and today they threat each other with nuclear bombs.4. Human rights were much better under the British regime. Still todaywomen are stoned to death and burned. 5. Instead of being thankfulltowards the British (cos they fought against the Nazis at that time)Gandhi choose to stab the knife in the back of the British for hisnationalist aspirations.
    When you cut out most of the history than it is pure manipulation.Millions of people think that Gandhi was a good man - what a BIG LIE!

    User: (ldlAkasha)
    Added: 17 January 2002
    Vote: 17

    historically inaccurate

    This movie had potential. It could have informed the western public aboutan important part of history. Instead, it caricatured the era, leavingoutsignificant characters (Subhaschandra Bose, etc.), g